Archive for the ‘General’ Category

12 year old boy fatally shot by police holding replica firearm

There has been much buzz surrounding this tragic incident in Cleveland, OH, and frankly most of it ignores either the facts of the case or the realities of the situation. Let’s take a look at what happened.

According to the AP, as found at Police One, the boy was waving around a gun and scaring people at a playground. The 911 caller said he did not know if it was real or not. The caller said he told dispatch he thought it was probably fake. Now considering how realistic many of these items are, SEE PHOTO HERE  it makes me wonder on what basis the caller, who was at a distance, decided that this was “probably fake” other than his disbelief that a 12 year old boy could possibly be threatening people with a real gun.

Most major cities are grappling with youth violence. Minneapolis started to deal with this as a “public health threat” when they realized that over 50% of their violent crime was committed by juveniles. See here and here.  I recall an incident this spring where a 13 year old stabbed someone in the neck at a bus stop and nearly killed his robbery victim. In major cities, this is just the way things are.

Now to address the officer’s response. As a firearms and permit to carry instructor, and court-approved expert witness I am quite aware of the realities of situations like these. As both a civilian and a Protective Agent, I have been in them myself. For those who are not familiar, the rules are rather basic. If you are confronted or confront someone, regardless of age, who has been threatening people with what is reported to be a firearm you had best be doing so with a firearm if one is available to you and you can get to it in time.

When a command is given to someone at gunpoint to raise their hands, and they reach for a gun they are very likely to be shot. People are pointing out that the boy never pointed it at the officer. I do not know of any professional level training that tells you to wait until you are being shot at to defend yourself, and the difference between being shot at and pointing the gun is a matter of a fraction of a second.

Another consideration that needs to be taken into account is the rather anemic performance of handguns when it comes to the time required to incapacitate a suspect. The magic one shot stops where the suspect instantly falls down incapable of action is strictly a creature of hollywood. This is why, with handguns, shot placement and volume are the keys to survival.

So when the officer responded, saw a gun on a table or bench, saw the suspect put it in his waistband and then confronted him there was no reason to believe this was anything other than a real firearm. Not only had the orange tip been altered or removed that would identify it as a replica, criminals have been known to paint real firearms to look like toys. He had also not been informed of the caller’s belief that he thought it fake.

There are more things that we do not know about what happened in this case, but on the information available this sounds like a case of legitimate self-defense.

CA 10 day waiting period ruled un-Constitutional

Senior Judge Anthony W. Ishii, a Bill Clinton appointee, of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, ruled the 10-day waiting period violated the rights of those having already met the other standards of the laws of that state. “The 10-day waiting periods of Penal Code [sections 26815(a) and 27540(a)] violate the Second Amendment” as applied to members of certain classifications, like Silvester and Combs, and “burdens the Second Amendment rights of the Plaintiffs”, Said Judge Ishii.

Those that have passed a background check and hold a license to carry a handgun, or who hold a “certificate of eligibility” and possess at least one other gun known to the state are no longer subject to the waiting period.

The case was brought by California gun owners Jeffrey Silvester and Brandon Combs, as well as two gun rights groups, The Calguns Foundation and Second Amendment Foundation. As one can expect, all plaintiffs are happy as can be. ““This is a great win for Second Amendment civil rights and common sense,” said Jeff Silvester, “I couldn’t be happier with how this case turned out.”

While this is one small step in what is becoming a increasingly heated debate over the right to bear arms in this country, considering the state and the judge, one can look at this as a very positive sign that the rights of the people will not be as readily stripped as some would like to see.

You can read the decision here.

 

 

Clerk uses age to trick robber and grab gun

A former police officer, turned gas station clerk, was in for a surprise a week ago when an armed robbery took place in the Chesapeake, VA gas station where he was working. At first, Sammy Williams thought that the robber was joking, until he produced a gun, demanding money and other items. Williams was quoted by WKTR as stating:

“I thought it was a prank. I said dude gotta be kidding, joking. I said no to opening the drawer.”

Until this happened next:

“He started shaking the gun at me telling me to give him the other till which we don`t keep there anymore because we got robbed at the same store on June 25th at 2:40 in the afternoon. So that`s why we had a weapon there. He got upset because there wasn`t another till, so he said give me that green bag over there. I said ‘No that`s mine. It’s got my medicine it. I’m an older person, that`s my blood pressure medicine in it.’”

Buying himself time, he was able to grab his gun, hit the silent alarm, and then exchanged fire with the suspect. He fired 6 times, and it is believed that he hit the suspect 2 times. It was reported that the 6 shots were all fired within about 2 seconds.

“He was going to kill me. I wasn’t trying to hit him in the leg or shoulder. I was hitting for the sweet spot basically,” says Williams. “But my adrenaline is so high that my 6 rounds were all over the place.”

Despite purportedly hitting him twice, the suspect did get away and is still at large.

This story is certainly nothing that we ever want to encounter first hand. It illustrates that what we teach in our course is a very good representation of just how fast these incidents go down and how they are nothing like you see in the movies. You’re almost never going to see the sights on your weapon, and might not even see the weapon in your hands. The so called “aiming to wing ’em” stuff that is espoused by so many, simply will not work.

Frank McGee, former head of NYPD’s Firearms Training Unit, liked to say that any armed conflict (involving police, but certainly can be applied to civilians) usually followed the rule of threes; Three shots, three seconds, three yards. This incident went outside of that a bit, but not by much. Williams fired 6 shots in under 2 seconds, and was able to hit his target with two of those shots. The fact that he had his wits about him and was able to distract the suspect long enough to get his own weapon and fire, quite possibly saved his life.

We have always taught that Time = Distance = Options. While distance probably didn’t apply as much here, he certainly bought himself some time, therefore presenting himself with an option that he didn’t have just seconds before.

There is a reason that we teach what we teach, it works in the real world. It’s been proven in combat, it’s been proven in self defense situations, and it is, simply put, the most practical approach to self defense that we’ve seen. Leave the macho attitudes and tactics at the door. You should plan your self defense strategy using proven methods that will afford you every chance to stay out of harms way, allowing you to get home safely.

Self defense is not static. You cannot plan a scenario for every altercation or event that might come up. Self defense is a very dynamic beast and thinking on your feet might just keep you out of danger in the first place, or like Mr. Williams here, give you a fighting chance if conflict is unavoidable.

-Brent

Another huge blow for Kalashnikov enthusiasts.

Tonight, as I sit at my computer, checking various links and Facebook as I do, I came across something that troubled me greatly.  As I tried to source it, tried to find other stories backing it up, it seemed more and more likely to be true, as the minutes flew by.  It appears that another nail in the coffin of the Second Amendment is being hammered in as we speak.

According to the website www.treasury.gov, the official website of the US Department of the Treasury, new entities (both individuals and otherwise), have now been added to the Sectoral Sanctions Identifications List administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).  None of those entities matter to me, or anyone else that I know, with the exception of the following:

KALASHNIKOV CONCERN (a.k.a. CONCERN KALASHNIKOV; a.k.a. IZHEVSKIY MASHINOSTROITEL’NYI ZAVOD OAO; f.k.a. IZHMASH R&D CENTER; f.k.a. JSC NPO IZHMASH; f.k.a. NPO IZHMASH OAO; a.k.a. OJSC CONCERN KALASHNIKOV; f.k.a. OJSC IZHMASH; f.k.a. SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION ASSOCIATION IZHMASH JOINT STOCK COMPANY), 3, Derjabin Pr., Izhevsk, Udmurt Republic 426006, Russia; Registration ID 1111832003018 [UKRAINE2].

The entire source document can be found here

When I saw this, it hit me a like a ton of bricks.  The link for today’s entry to the page is located here, with additional links to the FAQ and others previously added to the SSI List.

What this means for any of you who may own an AK, or who aspires to, is that no entity based in the US can enter into any more business dealings with Kalashnikov Concern or Izhmash, one of the biggest AK manufacturers of AKs and accessories on the planet.  To give you an idea of what this covers, no longer will VEPR, Saiga, or any others marked Izhmash, be able to be imported into the US if Izhmash has any stake in the importation whatsoever.

According to the FAQ page found on www.treasury.gov, in relation to this issue, and to Kalashnikov Concern directly, entries 374 and 375 shed some light on the situation:

374. If I own a Kalashnikov product, is that product blocked by sanctions?  Am I able to resell a Kalashnikov product at a gun show or other secondary market? 

If a U.S. person is in possession of a Kalashnikov Concern product that was bought and fully paid for prior to the date of designation (i.e., no payment remains due to Kalashnikov Concern), then that product is not blocked and OFAC sanctions would not prohibit the U.S. person from keeping or selling the product in the secondary market, so long as Kalashnikov Concern has no interest in the transaction.  New transactions by U.S. persons with Kalashnikov Concern are prohibited, however, and any property in which Kalashnikov Concern has an interest is blocked pursuant to OFAC’s designation of Kalashnikov Concern on July 16, 2014.  If a U.S. person has an inventory of Kalashnikov Concern products in which Kalashnikov Concern has an interest (for example, the products are not fully paid for or are being sold on consignment), we advise that U.S. person to contact OFAC for further guidance on handling of the inventory. [7-16-2014]

375. If I have Kalashnikov products in my inventory, can I sell them?

If a U.S. person has an inventory of Kalashnikov Concern products in which Kalashnikov Concern has an interest (for example, the products are not fully paid for or are being sold on consignment), we advise that U.S. person to contact OFAC for further guidance on handling of the inventory. [7-16-2014]

The full FAQ that this is sourced from can be found here

This all dates back to an Executive Order (13662, found here) signed by Obama on March 20th of this year, as a result of the situation in Ukraine.  This only further builds upon that by bolstering the sanctions against even more entities, this time the famous manufacturer.

When is enough, enough?  When will we wake up and realize that none of these measures are taken for our safety?  We are simply pawns in a political game much bigger than you or I, and I for one hate feeling like I don’t have a say in where we’re moved on the board.  I’m not just talking about our gun rights either, although it seems like they have been under assault more than any other lately (with the exception of maybe our rights guaranteed by the 4th Amendment).  This is just another huge blow for AK enthusiasts, coming right up on the heels of the BATFE ban on the importation of 5.45 caliber 7N6 ammunition used in the AK74.

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Justice system fails, 6 of family of 7 executed in TX

In another horrifying incident, a man with a violent background executes 6 of a family of 7, the seventh being wounded and playing dead. Four young children, and the parents died, leaving only a 15 year old girl as the survivor.

The suspect was looking for  his estranged wife, and apparently bound and questioned each victim about her location and then executed them. This was not limited to this incident, as he was charged with assaulting his own mother last week in San Diego County in a similar fashion, according to KPRC court documents allege he duct taped her, questioned her about his estranged wife’s location and then assaulted her.

Minnesota crime statistics are clear, the VAST majority of homicide victims knew their attacker. We can infer that is it likely similar in other states. The failure of the system to protect is evident here. While is is lunacy to expect police to protect you from any particular random incident of violence, this was the one year anniversary of the restraining order that his wife had granted against him.

He was incarcerated in the Cache County jail in 2008 per KSTU for “domestic assault and domestic violence in the presence of a child. Those charges were eventually dropped after a plea deal was reached.”

So, there was a violent criminal offense in 2008 which the justice system ignored, a restraining order a year ago, and he assaulted his OWN MOTHER last week, but no one saw fit to keep this (suspected) clearly violent person off the streets? Yes, this is clearly a gun issue as we know it will be made out to be.

And this terrible tragedy was not worse thanks to the survivor who managed to inform police that her attacker was headed to another relatives house in time to get a plainclothes officer there to evacuate the targets and arrest the suspect after a several hour standoff. After being shot in the head. We firmly believe the term hero is far overused. This, on the other hand is what one is. Despite likely fearing her own death, her only actions were in defense of others.

We rarely if ever post about fund raising efforts, as we prefer to remain neutral on most issues, but if you are so inclined, the links to do so are on the news sites we linked.

As always, our hearts go out to the countless people affected by this act. May God have mercy on their souls.

-The staff at Pistolcraft

 

On the Target debate, its effects and compromise

So over the last week or so, the Liberty loving staff at Pistolcraft have been involved in a rather heated debate with the local “gun-rights” group here in the once great state of Minnesota.

When the head of Target issued a letter under pressure from an anti-gun group to ban guns in its stores, Target took what may (from a corporate perspective) have been the best path it could under the conditions. It issued a letter requesting no firearms be brought onto its property. Considering that the gun rights crowd has not been putting together the necessary social and financial pressure to combat the opposition’s current strategy, they took the middle of the road approach hoping to appease both sides enough to not damage the bottom line, which is the job of a business.

It is up to us to take the requisite action to convince them of the wisdom (or lack thereof) of such policies. The traditional methods are still the best. Phone calls beat emails hands down. Boycotting and stripping them of revenue to show them that this policy WILL effect the bottom line is now necessary in our opinion, as the letter has been made public.

And, as expected by many of those following this issue, much like Jack in the Box, the armed robberies of customers have begun. A story published yesterday details several armed robberies in Georiga. There will be others. We had the same experiences in many states with smaller businesses that posted signs and got robbed. When the signs came down, most of the robberies stopped.

We here at Pistolcraft see the damage that incrementalism has done in the world of civil rights over the course of American history, and this is no different. If we allow even an inch, they will eventually take that mile. Bloomberg and his crowd are trumpeting these victories far and wide, and the media is proud to aid them. Make no mistake about it, when they get enough of these ‘requests’ granted, they will move for outright bans in private establishments, and then for other restrictions on carry in public venues.

What does GOCRA, the local “gun rights” group have to say about Target issuing this letter? They call it a “win”.

10417794_10152941843212542_8721695057187509251_n

We see this as anything but a win. It is long past time for those who love Liberty to stop compromising, and not give any more ground in what is a multi-faceted battle for the rights so many fought and died to ensure to us (many other freedoms are also under constant attack). We have written previously about this happening with other major chains, and the trend is increasing. Now Target is added to the list of Starbucks, Chilis, Jack-In-The-Box, Chipotle, and likely others that do not want the business of law abiding armed citizens.

We say abide by their private property rights, and boycott them. Let them know you are doing it. We will soon be creating a series of pages on our site detailing those that stand opposed to your choice to be armed, and contact info along with form letters to use in contacting them detailing your respect for their private property rights.

To those who oppose our rights to self-protection, we stand fast against you. We will fight you to the last.

To those who cower alongside them, seek not our business or our support.

NOT ONE MORE INCH

-The staff at Pistolcraft

 

 

TX robberies, shootings where guns not welcome

In all places, Texas has now joined the growing conflict between open carry demonstrators and the anti-gun pressure brought to bear on major restaurant chains. In mid-May there were two demonstrators with rifles in a Dallas Chipotle. There was also a demonstration by Open Carry Texas on May 5 at a Fort Worth Jack in the Box where, having received no notice from the group, police were called and responded to the event as an armed robbery. Since that time both Chipotle and Jack in the Box have requested that guns not be brought into their stores. On Friday it was announced that Sonic and Chili’s followed suit.

This raises the kind of questions in the pro-gun crowd that have many various opinions. Do private property rights trump the right to bear arms? Are these kind of protests doing more harm than good to the Second Amendment movement?Are these demonstrations causing fear or creating support?

It would seem, at least at first blush that the anti-gun crowd has much more influence on corporate policy. However, the outcome predicted by many in the pro-gun crowd is that banning guns increases crime. At least at Jack in the Box, this does seem to be the case.

In the ten days or so since this policy was announced, they have been the victim of 3 armed robberies. One involved both the restaurant and the customers being robbed by 4 men who donned masks and gloves. One of the four was caught when a customer followed the suspect’s vehicle according to this story.

Apparently they did not follow the story from last August where 6 armed men were holding up a Denny’s in SE Houston when one of the customers came out of the restroom, saw her brother on the floor at gunpont, and proceeded to draw her legally carried weapon and open fire.  No customers were hurt, and the robbers fled. STORY HERE.

This is a situation that is heating up all over the country for the last months, and will likely continue to do so as the rights of the people are hotly contested.

SAF court victory in Arkansas

“a federal judge ruled the state’s concealed carry licensing law that bans legal resident aliens from obtaining permits is unconstitutional”

Another small victory, but each step towards the liberty of the people being restored is a good one. Keep in mind it’s the smaller groups like the Second Amendment Foundation, Gun Owners of America, and Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership that do not believe in compromise like so many state groups and larger political machines such as the NRA.

STORY HERE

 

Breaking news – MN neighbor dispute turns deadly

Few details are available other than this was an ongoing dispute, that ended in one dead, one wounded and the shooter turning themselves in after the incident.

The statistics have long proven that the vast majority of homicide victims in some way knew their attacker. This case is no different. The sad reality is most of these incidents would likely in some way have been preventable had things been handled differently.

This is why we teach many things that others do not. How to stay alive and out of prison is a much different matter than merely meeting a minimum standard for a permit to carry.

As always, we extend our sympathies to any innocents harmed and their loved ones.

STORY HERE

 

Good samaritan slain chasing robbery suspect

This tragic event outlines why attempting to stop a criminal is often a bad idea. Would this have turned out differently if he had a firearm? Perhaps, perhaps not. Once you enter into a situation where violence is present or likely, all bets are off. You may or may not see the attack coming in time to deploy a weapon. There are potential legal issues as well, and then of course Murphy’s law.

STORY HERE

 

Search
Categories